Thursday, May 11, 2006

Chomsky Chums With Hezbollah


Via Drudge Report

Radical American thinker and MIT professor Noam Chomsky met with Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut today and branded the U.S. a terrorist state.

"I think that Nasrallah has a reasoned argument and a persuasive argument that they (the weapons) should be in the hands of Hizbollah as a deterrent to potential aggression and there is plenty of background and reasons for that. So, I think his position, if I am reporting it correctly, and it seems to be a reasonable position, is that until there is a general political settlement in the region and the threat of aggression and violence is reduced or eliminated, there has to be a deterrent. The Lebanese army cannot be a deterrent."

"There is a meaning to the word terrorist, in fact you can read a definition of term terrorist is the U.S. code of laws. It gives a very clear, precise, adequate definition of the word terrorist. have been writing about terrorism for 25 years always using the official U.S. definition [of the word "terrorist"], but that definition is un-usable, and the reason is that when you use that definition it turns out, not surprisingly, that the U.S is one of the leading terrorist states, and the other states become terrorist or non-terrorist depending on how they are relating to U.S. goals."

"The regional superpower Israel is threatening to attack it [Iran], the U.S. is threatening to attack it. These threats alone are outright violations international law and of the U.N. charter. Iran is in difficulty. Iran has been trying for some years to negotiate settlement but the U.S. just refuses."

Chomsky's anti-Semitism is well documented.

Chomsky and the Neo-Nazis

The name Robert Faurisson represents the most obvious (but not the most significant) connection between Chomsky and the neo-Nazis. Faurisson is a French hate-filled crank, a one-time lecturer in literature at the University of Lyon, right-wing, and deeply anti-Semitic. (17) As we shall see presently (and although he denies this heatedly), Chomsky seems to have taken to this gentleman and has, in any case, seen fit to keep political company with him.

Faurisson says that he is proud that his writings are distributed by partisans of both the left (La Vieille Taupe) and the right wing (Ogmios). The fact is that, in each case, these are tiny sectarian groupings. Ogmios is a Parisian bookstore-cum-movement that belongs to the anti-Semitic, anti-foreign, extreme right wing of the French political spectrum. It is reported to have received financial aid from the government of Iran. (18) Far more important to Faurisson is La Vieille Taupe ("The Old Mole") under the leadership of Pierre Guillaume, a small group of self-styled leftists who publish Faurisson's booklets and pamphlets, advertise them, publicize them, propagandize for them. It is they who are the friends of Chomsky, and it is through them that Chomsky was recruited to his present position as grand patron of the neo-Nazi movement. (At the time of this writing, Ogmios and La Vieille Taupe have joined forces to publish a new anti-Semitic review, Annales d'Histoire Révisionniste.)

Since the 1960's, Faurisson says, he has devoted innumerable hours to what he considers a very deep study of the fate of the Jews during the Second World War. He has written some books and articles on the subject and summarizes his "findings" as follows:

""The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which opened the way to a gigantic political-financial swindle, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and the principal victims of which are the German people ­­ but not its leaders and the entire Palestinian people.""

Nazi's, Sociaslists, Marxists and the Mahajadeen all share this same principle.

6 Comments:

Blogger beakerkin said...

I have made similar points in the past. There is a reason that you do not see Chomsky on Fox or talk radio he would get creamed. I would pay to see Monica Crowley or Mark Levin dismantle Chomsky. He is a phony and a coward.

May 11, 2006  
Blogger kevin said...

I've been holding on to the "Partners in Hate" article for just such an occasion. Chomsky didn't dissapoint. Socialists just can't let go of their anti-Semitic roots, the left remains in denial.

May 11, 2006  
Blogger beakerkin said...

Don't get too mad at Brown or Weasie. If you haven't notices I use them as cyber comedic props.
They are obtuse and can not see past their own bigotry.

You really should take a spin in the Hot seat. The interview with the Physics Grad student came out very well

May 11, 2006  
Blogger kevin said...

Whenever you're up for it Beaker.
In re; JB & Da Weeze, you ever notice how often they use profanities and name calling? I don't get that. I never liked Clinton , but I can write Clinton without sounding like a petulant teenager with Terret's syndrome. I think Carter was the worst president in the last century, but I can do so civilly, but try to get a liberal to President Bush without the predictable pejoritives.

May 11, 2006  
Blogger WomanHonorThyself said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

May 12, 2006  
Blogger WomanHonorThyself said...

Beak is right on spot about Chomsky...Noam is a self hating demented person...I cant believe anyone takes him seriously..in case he doesnt know it..Hitler would have killed him despite his self hate.

May 12, 2006  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home